Can Twitter Photos Predict Value Motion Throughout FED Bulletins?
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) conferences are referred to as the “Superbowl of Finance” as a consequence of their vital affect on monetary markets. These conferences, the place important selections about financial coverage are made, appeal to the eye of merchants and traders worldwide. The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Belief (SPY) performac and fairness threat premia are carefully watched throughout occasions near the speed change announcement, as they will present insights into market sentiment and potential actions. Crypto has lately develop into mainstream and has additionally been accepted as a normal asset class. Market individuals in that house are additionally carefully watching the outcomes of press conferences and judging the power of the Fed’s Chair to fulfill the questions of curious reporters on future projections about financial development and clarify anticipated selections.
Apparently, the intersection of social media and textual content evaluation coupled with picture evaluation supplies uncanny insights about financial coverage: current analysis has proven that sentiment evaluation of Twitter photographs can predict inventory efficiency throughout FOMC days a lot better than textual content alone. Analysis paper finds that, along with the elevated use of photographs round FOMC bulletins, the picture tone is considerably and negatively related to the implied FOMC threat premium and positively related to realized returns round FOMC announcement days for each fairness and Treasury bond markets. In the meantime, Twitter textual content tone is just not statistically vital with the implied FOMC threat premium or realized extra returns. These outcomes align with the established significance of public sentiment expressed on Twitter and the rising utilization of visible media for expressing opinions. The insignificant outcomes for textual content tone could be pushed by the problems of quantifying the textual content of tweets because of the elevated substitution of photographs over textual content and points with correct quantification of tweet textual content as a consequence of diversified features similar to emoticons, sarcasm, and slang.
This progressive method leverages pure language processing and picture evaluation to gauge market sentiment, providing a brand new device for traders to think about. Are days of pure textual content parsing lengthy gone as they will not present dependable details about normal investor public sentiment? Whereas there isn’t a direct technique derived from this evaluation, the regression tables supplied within the analysis provide helpful insights which are insightful for additional evaluation.
The paper’s introduction highlights the significance of understanding market sentiment and its predictive energy, particularly throughout important monetary occasions like FOMC conferences. Part 3.3 delves deeper into the methodology and findings, making it a compelling learn for astute readers taken with social media and monetary market relationships.
Authors: Sakshi Jain, Alexander Kurov, Bingxin Li, and Jalaj Pathak
Title: Twitter Picture Tone and FOMC Bulletins
Hyperlink: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4937152
Summary:
We quantify the picture and textual content tone of tweets round FOMC bulletins and report proof on the rising use of visible content material. We discover that it’s the tone of photographs in tweets, moderately than the textual content, that’s considerably related to the implied FOMC threat premium and realized return within the fairness and bond markets round FOMC bulletins. One customary deviation improve in picture tone corresponds to a six foundation level lower within the implied FOMC threat premium. These outcomes are in keeping with the established significance of public sentiment expressed on Twitter; and with rising visible media utilization within the expression of opinions which characteristic unconventional parts similar to emoticons, sarcasm, and slang. The affect of picture tone is powerful for monetary market-related tweets, various measures of threat premium, textual content tone, subsets of tweets, and totally different time intervals round FOMC bulletins.
And as at all times, we current a number of attention-grabbing figures and tables:
Notable quotations from the tutorial analysis paper:
“Particularly, we quantify the textual content and picture tone of tweets round FOMC bulletins and look at their corresponding affect on implied FOMC threat premiums and realized returns for each fairness and bond markets. We quantify the Twitter picture tone utilizing the CNN picture classification machine studying mannequin (Obaid and Pukthuanthong, 2022; Jiang et al., 2023). Whereas the Twitter textual content tone is calculated utilizing TweetNLP (Camacho-Collados et al., 2022). The implied FOMC threat premium used on this examine is calculated in keeping with Liu et al. (2022) and is an options-based measure computed round FOMC bulletins that minimizes potential contamination attributable to different threat elements.1 The examine focuses on the interval from 2013 to 2019 because of the availability of Twitter information from 2013.2 The seven-year dataset encompasses quite a few vital coverage actions by the Federal Reserve, together with the continuation of quantitative easing, the federal funds price liftoff, gradual price hikes, and coverage reversals.
As supported by Azar and Lo (2016), Masciandaro et al. (2023) and Schmanski et al. (2023), Twitter is an effective proxy for the sentiment of most of the people which ultimately interprets to the sentiment of the market particularly across the main financial occasions such because the FOMC bulletins. Additional, with the reducing consideration spans, we imagine the pictures are an vital technique of expressing and receiving info, at par with textual content, or presumably much more (Obaid and Pukthuanthong, 2022). We argue that photographs are extra carefully related to key info, whereas textual content tends to supply extra complete particulars. On Twitter, a put up could usually embody a single picture with a further line of textual content. This means that Twitter customers use photographs to convey a very powerful message they need to share, whereas textual content serves to supply extra context or background info. This structural distinction highlights why photographs are sometimes extra pertinent to the principle level and why textual content supplies supplementary, and generally much less central, particulars. With these issues, we hypothesize a adverse and vital relationship between Twitter tone and the Implied FOMC threat premium (Liu et al., 2022) and a constructive relationship with realized returns (Cieslak et al., 2019) as a consequence of Twitter tone being a proxy for market sentiment and therefore an elevated constructive tone/decreased adverse tone implying an improved market notion and sentiment for each fairness and bond markets.
The adverse relationship of picture tone with the implied FOMC threat premium is in keeping with the interpretation of the implied FOMC threat premium established by Liu et al. (2022). Based on their definition, the implied FOMC threat premium is negatively related to constructive financial developments, and vice versa. It is because during times of financial development similar to will increase in GDP and consumption development, the danger premiums are decrease as a consequence of decrease perceived threat, whereas during times of financial downturns, the danger premiums are larger to compensate for larger perceived dangers. We additionally discover a constructive and vital relationship between picture tone and S&P 500 index extra returns (Cieslak et al., 2019), in addition to the realized returns in bond markets (Adrian et al., 2013). Since threat premium displays the pessimism out there, a constructive measure of public expression has a adverse affiliation with it. Nonetheless, the surplus returns in fairness and bond markets mirror the optimism out there and thus have a constructive relationship with the general public expression on Twitter.In distinction to the adverse and vital relationship between tweet picture tone and the implied FOMC threat premium, the affiliation between tweet textual content tone and the implied FOMC threat premium is just not vital. […]
Determine 2 presents the implied FOMC threat premiums (IFRP) for the day of FOMC bulletins for the danger aversion coefficients of γ = 5, γ = 7.5 and γ = 10 resulting in α = −13, α = −20.5 and α = −28 respectively (Liu et al., 2022; Campbell and Thompson, 2007). The traits reveal pronounced fluctuations, with a notable peak in IFRP utilizing an α of -20.5 in each 2016 and 2018. IFRP values with α of -28 and -13 comply with the same sample, displaying overlapping traits from 2016 to 2018.
Desk 6 presents the affect of Twitter photographs and textual content tone on the S&P 500 index extra returns. The surplus return is calculated by measuring returns that exceed the risk-free returns of the 30-day US Treasury payments (Cieslak et al., 2019; Lucca and Moench, 2015). Panel A presents the outcomes for the affect of the day t − 1 Twitter picture and textual content tone on the FOMC announcement day extra returns calculated for interval [0, +1] with respect to the FOMC announcement. Equally, panel B reveals the outcomes for the associations between the Twitter picture and textual content tone calculated on the day previous to FOMC bulletins and the surplus return for the interval [−1, 0].”
Are you in search of extra methods to examine? Join our publication or go to our Weblog or Screener.
Do you need to be taught extra about Quantpedia Premium service? Test how Quantpedia works, our mission and Premium pricing provide.
Do you need to be taught extra about Quantpedia Professional service? Test its description, watch movies, evaluate reporting capabilities and go to our pricing provide.
Are you in search of historic information or backtesting platforms? Test our record of Algo Buying and selling Reductions.
Or comply with us on:
Fb Group, Fb Web page, Twitter, Linkedin, Medium or Youtube
Share onLinkedInTwitterFacebookDiscuss with a good friend
